I've been considering ideas for possible future pieces for my column, "Sex Is All Metaphors," on the site of Erotic Readers & Writers Association.
Votes, comments, suggestions all welcome.
1. Is "Interracial" Still a Fetish?- To start with, I'm not sure I have a firm grasp of "fetish" sexuality in erotic writing or real life. Sure, feet/shoes can be sexy, so can hair, so can breasts (duh), asses, lingerie, leather, silk, fur, etc., but surely one can't avoid noticing that all these things exist on or as part of an actual human body inhabited by (for lack of a better word) a spirit or a personality. So I don't really see how the fetish item can completely replace other sensory stimuli.
"Interracial" (or "interracial
sex") as a fetish is even more problematic. Sure, racially-specific physical characteristics (straight/curly/kinky hair, lips, noses, eyes, skin of various hues) fascinate sheltered types who haven't had direct contact with them before. (This would prob. apply to anyone living in Mississippi circa 1920.) But how long do characteristics different from one's own hold the sexual charge of a "fetish"?
Can anyone even be sure they are purebred or uniracial?? "Passing for white" is a time-honored tradition in white racist cultures. Check out the pedigree of a "white" person (esp. one who protests too much or whose ancestors didn't all live in the same inaccessible village) , esp. in North America, & you're likely to find a few other ingredients (somewhat like the "unidentified fibers" listed in some clothing.)
A documentary on makeup for stage & cinema that I watched in England in 1974 claimed that the average "white" (or European) complexion in the U.S. is a shade darker than in Britain. Guess why?
Besides which, people tend to mate with others of approximately the same social status unless there are strong cultural taboos against it, so "People of Color" can include a whole kaleidoscope.
Yet "interracial" is still listed as a category or genre of erotic films & stories. When is a plot erotically "interracial" and when it is just a realistic story about a relationship in an urban 21st century milieu?
2. "Getting Paid for It"
- the true story of my life in sex work in the 1980s, formerly published in a local leftist magazine (March theme issue on the status of women to coincide with International Women's Day).
I don't find this fascinating myself, but would rerun it if there's any interest. (This is not a smirking comedy subtitled "The Best Little Whorehouse on the Prairie.")
3. "Kiddie Porn" as the Boogeyman
- The sexual abuse of children by adults is clearly perverse in the most nauseating sense (esp. for reasonably sane parents). But does the ban on "kiddie porn" really require that autobiographical writing about early sexual experience (the babysitter with her boyfriend, two girlfriends sharing a bed, two boys on a camping trip, all under the age of consent in their jurisdiction) be banned from publication everywhere on earth, and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law? Does this response really protect anyone's innocence?
And what about the photos of naked babies and children taken in earlier times? (Such as the whole embarrassing photo gallery of me, the firstborn in my first year, that my doting parents used to show their visitors, or Lewis Carroll's 1860s photographic studies of little girls "in the life.") Should the putti in paintings by the Renaissance Masters be covered by black stripes or deliberately blurred in reproductions?
Why does the age of consent vary from one jurisdiction to another if we can all agree on who is and is not a "child"?
Will two unsmiling people in uniform show up at my door if I write this piece & post it in public?
4. The Acronyms Revisited- Some folks complain that both the LGBTQ (gay/les/bi/trans/genderfuck/whocares) community and the
BDSM (bondage/discipline/sadism/masochis
m/slaves/masters) community have become or are becoming too fragmented into different sub-communities or cliques.
Yet in both cases, earlier, simpler definitions of "the community," its history and who belonged in it were problematic, and no one seems eager to go back there (e.g. to when "gay" meant closeted, male, "effeminate" and usually white).
So does "community spirit" need to be whipped up, so to speak, in either case? Is either "community" growing stronger or falling apart? Is either "community" assimilating into the "mainstream," or is assimilation a pathetic illusion?
5. Utopia- What would a sexually healthy society look like? (Most folks I know agree that this is not where any of us live now, in what passes for Real Life.)
6. Topic X- What hasn't already been discussed enough?